Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
Oct 8, 2012 7:00pm EDT
, it's probably a lot more. this is a government-wide program. we had the same thing going on at nasa with the administrator a couple years ago when he was going it to outreach with muslims and we had it with the fbi director last year when he met with muslim groups. it's one thing to create diversity transformation, but it's another thing to use taxpayer money for these things when it's not what the agencies are about. it's clearly inappropriate. >> this is the agriculture department. what does this have to do chanting our forefathers were immigrants? fine. what does chanting that have to do with the mission of the u.s. department of agriculturagricul. i don't understand na. >> absolutely nothing. what happened is over the years there was some discrimination aat the usda. then they brought in a program called pickford, and billions were paid out on fraudulent loan applications in the usda. the usda put into effect during the obama administration to try to reach out to minority groups. that's a worthy goal, but you don't do it with taxpayer money when it's irrelevant to the mission of
Oct 4, 2012 11:00pm EDT
business. they have an aerospace division. and they make spacecraft components for nasa and small satellites. it's this side of the business that jeffries is truly worried about. the research reports feel like two duelists shooting it out. but right past each other, jeffries rated alliant a buy based on catalysts related to that space launch system i mentioned. the catalysts have come and gone and didn't play out as jeffries expected. plus, jeffries is concerned about the nasa budget going forward. in other words, the thesis didn't play out the way they hoped. so they're being disciplined and backing away from the wreck. that's what good investment is about. however, after we learned about atk's big lake city contract, it hit me over the head. this is good. and then jeffries came out with another note where they said it didn't change their view. the reason, they're worried that alliant had to cut pricing in order to win the contract. and they're also concerned about declining u.s. presence in afghanistan and shrinking army head count. these are reasonable concerns. i think they ma
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)